Music 101, PlatinumVoice News

Copyright Registration Is Not a Pre-Condition To Protection

Hey Y’all!

It’s Your Gyrl, Ms Carmen aka Platinum Voice PR bringing another relevant topic to you!

I think that any information about the music business is important. So take note on all the information that I blog about. Thanks for Reading!

Contrary to the near-indefatigable lay assumption, one is not required to register a copyright in one’s work with the U.S. Copyright Office at the Library of Congress in Washington, D.C. (or elsewhere) as a condition precedent for U.S. copyright protection. In other words, one already has copyright protection in one’s finished original work, under U.S. federal law. That protection is automatic.

When a writer says “I ‘copyrighted’ my novel by registering it with the Copyright Office”, the writer is usually operating under a mistaken set of assumptions, and it is incumbent upon lawyers to correct those assumptions. “No”, the copyright lawyer replies to the writer, “you already had automatic copyright protection in your work as soon as you wrote down the text – as soon as you reduced your vision to a ‘tangible medium of expression'”. The lawyer then explains that the phrases and verb forms “to copyright” or “I copyrighted” should probably be avoided outright, specifically to prevent that kind of lay confusion.

The process of U.S. copyright registration is just an after-occurring formality. In other words, the work is already copyright-protected prior to one’s submission of the work to the Library of Congress in Washington, D.C. Yes, U.S. copyright registration does then provide certain advantages over unregistered works. But registration is not itself a pre-requisite for protection.

Under the U.S. Copyright Act, (which can be found at various locations on the Internet, at 17 United States Code [U.S.C.] Section 101 and following); the author of an original and other  protectible work automatically possesses a copyright in that work as soon as the work is reduced to a “tangible medium of expression”. No later.

The choreographer improvises a new dance for her students but owns no copyright in it. However, the moment she writes down the original dance steps, or videotapes herself performing them, she may  have a chance to claim some copyright – protected work. The key is the work’s reduction to a fixed medium.

And this makes sense. Look at it from the perspective of enforcement. After all, how difficult would the job be of a federal judge or jury in a U.S. infringement litigation, or that of a U.S. Copyright Office examiner, if the U.S. Congress allowed all of us to claim copyright in the inchoate and evanescent? Therefore, Congress doesn’t let us get away with it. Congress requires reduction to a “tangible medium of expression” as a pre-condition for copyright protection. But no, Congress does not require registration – rather, registration is discretionary with the copyright owner.

Yes, after-occurring copyright registration of a work does offer certain strategic advantages, relative to unregistered works. Registration notifies the U.S. and the world, at least constructively, that the claimant thinks he or she owns the copyright in that registered work. Practically speaking, registration creates a likelihood that another company will “pick up” (i.e., see, or notice) the previously registered work, when that company later conducts a thorough professional (or even a cursory and informal) ocular copyright search of the public records. Most film studios perform thorough copyright searches as a matter of course, such as, before optioning an author’s literary work.

Copyright registration is also a necessary precursor to a copyright infringement litigation in a U.S. federal court. For this reason, in practice, people and companies have been occasionally known to register their copyrights days – or even hours – before they sue for infringement in federal court. (Of course, it is better to register the work at an earlier stage than that). Filing a copyright infringement litigation in turn allows the recovery of certain types of damages given by the Copyright Act (such as “statutory” damages and plaintiffs’ attorneys fees), and these types of damages would not be availing to the plaintiff if he or she sued using a different common law theory. A copyright registration may also work advantages in terms of certain international protections.

Source: John Tormey-Entertainment Lawyer

You never know where I may be bringing you the events of Chicago, so make sure you follow this blog and Follow me on Twitter, @PlatinumVoicePR! If you need your name and craft to buzz out here, go to Until next time, See ya later Babies!


(PlatinumVoice PR is the source for the events and has no legal bindings with associated parties)


Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.